| 
Rawr
Advert
Subscribe to the RSS feed Add to Google Become a fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Get email updates
Subscribe:

One of the things that I’m really enjoying about Wardrox’s latest (shameless plug alert!) pet project, Wire.vg, is that it is successfully helping me wade through much of the “stupid” that passes for videogame coverage on these here interwebz. Seeing as I like to talk about games and my life generally serves up opportunitites to do this, I’ve been promoting the new site whenever I can. God knows Wardrox’s other projects are likely doomed to crushing Dennisdyackian failure.

Aside from the usual places like videogame or electronics stores, I’m finding that there are more and more Dads talking about videogames while waiting for their little ones to go potty in public washrooms. Now, this isn’t as odd as it might sound. Raising children involves many ignominious changes to one’s life and standing in a public washroom singing softly to your son or daughter because it helps the “poopydoopy” come out, is just one of them. Public washrooms in restaurants, is just the latest place I have found other like-minded grey-hairs who like shooting things in the face.

I won’t bore you all with all of the debates that have gone on but I will state that the majority of videogame talk among men in washrooms, while waiting for junior to relieve himself, revolves around First-Person Shooters. I know, not exactly a surprise. Seeing as it’s Canada, up here we also talk a fair amount of hockey in washrooms but that’s just not relevant here. Occasionally we’ll also debate whether we in fact buy beer or just rent it, but that’s not germane either.

On one occasion recently I was talking to another Dad about Wire.vg while our kids were doing their business at a chain restaurant, when a third dad and his toddler came into the bathroom. I was talking about certain stories about monthly fees to play online shooters.

“The monthly fee idea seems kind of troublesome at first, but if it buys me special features and I get DLC and maps included then it’s a maybe for me.” I was saying. “If there’s a way to get all of the little rats off of Live that talk crap to me, and shouldn’t be playing anyway then I might consider it too.” Responded my new bathroom buddy. “The idea of contracts scares me because I don’t want to commit to anything for too long, but still…”

“Yo, screw Activision and their money grubbing nonesense.” Responded the third, obviously younger Dad, who was ushering in his toddler. “I’m not some loser MMO geek who is going to get sucked into paying a monthly fee for a game I already bought for my Xbox, that I already pay $60 bucks a year for the privilege to just use all of the features on the disc for Live Gold. If they go to this monthly fee I’m done.”

“But what if you got all of the DLC for a game included? What if you didn’t have to put up with a bunch of little welfare losers who skipped out on their third try at grade 10 to play videogames? Seriously isn’t that worth 10 bucks a month?” I asked. From the look on the face of the younger Dad, it became obvious that he might be one of the little twerps on Live or the PSN we were railing against. In retrospect the flat-lidded baseball cap that was turned to the side of his head should have been a clue. Any grown man who is a parent and wears his pants around his ass should be on federal watch-lists as far as I’m concerned. As I looked closer at him I noticed his pants were tucked into his socks. Good God he was even wearing fashion running shoes without laces.

An uncomfortable quiet came over the men’s room of this “Family Friendly” establishment. Then it dawned on me…he said “yo”, seriously, he said fucking “yo”. I wasn’t aware that people that did that without healthy doses of irony in their voices. Then he said it again; “Yo, I don’t care anyway, I’ll find a way to pirate that shit if it comes down to it anyway.” Now, my son is seven, he’s old enough to have heard the word shit and a fair number of other choice bad words in the schoolyard now but my bathroom buddy’s little guy was around three I think. He picked up his ankle-biter, they washed their hands in silence, and, after nodding at me, they left to go back their table for their nachos and chicken strips.

I turned to my son and gestured towards the door of the bathroom. Pale-One-Pac then turned to me and asked; “what’s that guy’s problem?”

“This is real life, he doesn’t have to put up with nonsense or coarse language if he doesn’t want to. Just imagine how many guys like that would pay for exclusive services in videogames and I think you’ll see how successful that development might be.”

Image: Flikr/dno1967

About the author
Phil Doherty is a Mental Health Case Manager by day and a Freelance Videogame Writer by night. Author of the web series, Adventures in Middle-Aged Gaming this husband and father of two still pines for the days of The Vectrex. Follow Phil on Twitter at http://twitter.com/Philbart999
Advert


Comments


darkwhitehair Says:

Like E3, bell bottom pants and casual racism, PHIL IS BACK BABY!


Naughton Says:

I think the idea of not having to play shooters with annoying-ass little kids is enticing, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that a subscription based service would do anything to remedy the situation. These little fuckers already have their parents credit cards hooked up to pay for Live every year, I don’t think that adding an additional charge will keep their poor excuses for parents from letting them play a game they shouldn’t be playing in the first place.


Phil Doherty Says:

@Naughton: fair point, I’m just very comfortable with Elitism, when I can afford it that is ;)


Yo, good post.


vintagenuck Says:

I’m somewhat open to an online subscription if it covers all games under a specific publisher’s umbrella. Paying EA $20-$30 annually is almost acceptable if it covers important DLC and online features for the games I buy. It would be another barrier of entry which would be a selling point for me, but as already said it wouldn’t do much to keep the jerks away.


Brett Parsons Says:

Lovely post, Phil. I see you finally found the right context for the term, “Dennisdyackian” into an Adventures post.

I have such a short attention span when it comes to online shooters I would side more with “Yo” Dad; shall we call him Dad-Y? In any case, I don’t pirate (anymore) and don’t get much value out of my FPS games when there’s a strong online component. Maybe if I had more time or the common sense to stop buying every new release that gets my attention.


NoZart Says:

The problem with the subscription model I think is that the devs will not bring out meaningful DLC anymore.


Phil Doherty Says:

@Brett Parsons: you’ve got a point. It’s hard to commit to 1 shooter with the way the release schedules are lining up for the rest of the year.

@NoZart: the 2 $15 packs that Infutility Ward are offering right now are pretty steep for what you get. It almost feels like they’re setting the community up to accept a fee for service plan. I guess my point is there’s not a lot of meaningful dlc coming out now.

Except for my beloved Red Dead Redemption that is…


Naughton Says:

@Phil Doherty: I’m betting that there will be a third set of $15 maps this year, which begs the question, how profitable would making COD a subscription service be, unless it was at least $45/year? Especially when there’s already a COD game released every year. Activision is dangerously close to Guitar Hero-ing another franchise if you ask me.

@Brett Parsons: Buying every new game that grabs your attention is financially irresponsible, you should seek help. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some Transformers to play.


NoZart Says:

@Phil Doherty: What i meant is when you pay a monthly fee anyway, the devs are not so much inclined to deliver prime DLC. Sub par shit will do. I cannot speak for MW or MW2, because i never got a map pack (i am from the light age of free maps and mods and will never adapt to such heresy). I think (maybe naively) if DLC has its own price, quality counts more because bad DLC will be panned, whereas in a subscription model the publisher already has your money and doesn’t care…


@Brett Parsons: “I…don’t get much value out of my FPS games when there’s a strong online component.” I’m the same way. I haven’t played TF2 on PC since the… Soldier Update? It’s been a LONG time. I could see myself springing for this type of model if the monthly fee netted you ALL of the content released (which I’m sure it would, Activision would be insane not to), so you could come back and play it for a month straight and have all of the new content and not play it again for a year (like I do with Counter-Strike).

If I don’t have a group of people that I know closely/like playing with playing a game I flat-out won’t play it, especially if it’s of a competitive nature. So what’s the point of having the subscription for that style of player?


Leave a Reply

You are not currently logged in. Comments by registered users are highlighted and are much more likely to be read. You can either login here, or register for Nukezilla here. It's also worth noting that if you're not registered and your comment contains a link, it will be marked as spam and may take a while to be manually approved.

For help with formatting and posting images click here.

| More