| 

Mom: “Nintendo Hurt My Child” and Media Scapegoating

Nicolo plays his Nintendo all the time. He likes discovering secrets and battling people. He gets sweaty fingers, though. Sometimes.

On a completely unrelated note, Michael Clingerman’s mother is going to be returning his Nintendo to the store! Why? He had a panic attack. And he screamed. He was obviously in pain. It’s those demonic vidya gaemz climbing into his brain and burrowing inside lke parasites. Isabelle Clingerman is taking her son’s Nintendo back to the store.

“I can’t recommend this game to any parent. It’s not a substitute for reading a book or doing an outdoor activity with your child.”

Did that make much sense?

I’m sure you’re all asking:

  • Why was the kid playing an NES?
  • What does the random child who gets sweaty fingers have to do with anything?
  • What retailer would take back an NES because some woman claims it’s hurting her child?
  • Who actually believes that an NES is a substitute for reading a book or doing an outdoor activity with your child?
  • What game was he playing?

Obviously, no NESs were involved. Here’s the simplified version of what happened:

The child was enjoying some gaming time. He began having an adverse reaction, such as a seizure or a panic attack similar to those caused by the Pokémon scare so many years ago. This is not an uncommon story. Some children are more sensitive to flashing lights or simple game mechanics, but may never show symptoms until enjoying games. Simple, right? We’ve seen it before, right?

That’s mainstream media for you, turning any gaming-related story that reports on phenomena we’re all already familiar with into BREAKING NEWS to shock as many overzealous parents as possible. Plus, they conveniently overlook details that might be prominent to the story, such as the fact that the child wasn’t playing a “Nintendo,” but was in reality gaming on a DS. However, we’re not even sure if it was a DS that this child had an adverse reaction to. The accompanying video to the article features DS demonstrations, but that’s because the first child it mentions just happens to be enjoying Castlevania.

 It’s also not mentioned what game the “injured” child was playing when this incident occurred. It’s almost as if the news channel is wallowing in its own ignorance and expects any households that contain the word “Nintendo” anywhere inside to immediately return products for fear of endangering their children. Wait a minute. It’s exactly like that. There is no real information given in this news report save for some mediocre “tips” on how to prevent injury or sickness while allowing children gaming time.

It’s a terrifying thought that this is the mindset that a good portion of the mass media possesses. Their unwillingness to shed any light on a subject they know little or nothing about is a slap in the face to those of us who choose to educate ourselves on things we don’t understand.

It’s a vicious cycle that will never end. Parents will watch these half-ass news reports, scour their homes for incriminating gaming systems, and forever live in fear that their little Johnny will seize at any moment the next time that he gets out his “Nintendo.” Boy, must be nice to have a company at your beck and call like that, so you can just play them whenever you want.

BRB, playing some Microsoft.

Ugh, this world.


Comments


wardrox Says:

JOURNALISM!!1

Halfleft Says:

Ignorance on the parent’s part, AGAIN.

I have yet to buy ANY gaming related item that doesn’t CLEARLY state warnings about photosensitive seizures in the manuals.

Darthziggy Says:

I work at a big retail chain, and I always laugh when parents come in and say then need a game for their kid’s “Nintendo.” And my response is always, ” ‘Nintendo’ what?” And then they just stare at me like I’m the moron. So I must clarify – Wii or DS. “Oh, DS.” Yeah, that’s the whole name of the console, dumbass.
Plus, I can’t tell you how many people come in buying games for the other systems and call them tapes. TAPES! They haven’t been cartridges since the goram N64! Sheesh.

So my question is, how often do other, “normal” products get returned because they had an unintended side effect? If I asked Wal-Mart, they’d probably say all the fucking time. Mainstream media, I hope you’re reading this: GAMES ARE NO FUCKING DIFFERENT. The games are clearly marked with a warning about possible reactions to the images. If you chose not to read them, then any damages are your own fucking fault. Parents seem to have so little responsibility these days.

michael clingerman Says:

THAT KIDS GOT MY NAME!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!1!!!!!!!!1


Leave a comment

You are not currently logged in. Comments by registered users are highlighted and are much more likely to be read. You can either login here, or register for Nukezilla here. It's also worth noting that if you're not registered and your comment contains a link, it will be marked as spam and may take a while to be manually approved.

 

For help with formatting and posting images click here. To edit your avatar click here (we use Globally Recognized Avatars so your avatar works on a bunch of different sites automatically).

because the games we love could be better